Information About Politics

Putting aside the most common notion that the politics involves the government and the political leadership in an organization like a state or a community. Politics is actually broader and more complex than the popular belief. It does extend to every sphere of the human endeavor and the interaction. In its most general sense, it involves the pursuit of self-interest of individuals. In a particular system of relationships like in a society this pursuit of individuals of particular goals is translated into the competition to wield power. With power one may attain the pinnacle of their goals in relation to others. Once one’s interest supersedes that of another the former logically wields more power than the latter, you can read an interesting article about Political Theology in the United States by clicking here.

A less known but broader side of politics involves intrigue, schemes & plots, manipulations, deceptions, mind games and stratagem. These comprise most of the realm of politics. An advantage for individuals who are active in this field is in-depth knowledge and understanding of these various aspects of political life. More so if an individual aspires not only to be a participant but an active player. This is because in this domain of human interaction, there are only two kinds of individuals those who influence and those who are influenced. Being the latter means you are subject to the interests of the former. And the latter always aspires to be the former while the former aims to remain as he or she is as the power in the status quo.

Information About Politics

A potent tool in conflict, particularly in the realm of politic is social engineering. This is the collection of psycho – social approaches implicitly compel individuals to perform acts, maintain thoughts and even provide information under the pretext that such is in his or her interest. In short, it is an insightful way of instigating manipulation for a particular goal. Meaning a person or persons can, through effective application of social engineering advantageously pursue political goals. The power of this methodology lies in its calculated incorporation of human nature in the techniques it offers. It provides approaches that appeal to the nuances and facets of human thought, behavior, prejudice, motivation and inclination. This implies that with this means holistic, virtually complete but subtle manipulation can be had. This is not new. In fact, for years politics has been closely related to these techniques. If politics can be taken as a form of advanced and complex chess game then this certainly will be the master’s guide to the same.

The capability to move another, to fill the thoughts of others with one’s ideas, to compel others that adhering to a particular view is valid and legitimate is what politics is about. With social engineering, a new level of micro – manipulation is possible. In the past threat of use of force, denial of material gain or promise of the same was the focal point of political relationships. …

Political Theology in the United States

If you looked up the definition of political theology, it would state that political theology investigates the ways in which theological concepts (or ways of thinking) relate to politics, society, and economics. Political Theology can be really confusing and irritating because the two words really contradict each other. Political theology was the manifestation of religious practices which served the state. Since people of importance practiced this act, it had pride in its name. However, over time, you had people step forward and demonstrate that it wasn’t essentially all about the state and sometimes the state can’t serve all of its people in a true religious form.

Of course you have different types of political theology in different countries read more about political theology at You have different ideas that are blended by different leaders in each country making the term to each of their own. The United States is hard when it comes to political theology because we’re not so much a Christian Nation – we can’t group the U.S. and say everyone is Christian, so political theology can get messy when talking about the United States and many philosophers have different feelings on the topic. It is often said however, that political theology can question the good and just of life. Some philosophers have argued that the ‘political’ term can really be referred to as ‘public’ theology. Meaning how the undercurrents of the current society that we’re in right now have eliminated the worth between the political and the public or social territory and between the state and society. In other words, how is today’s world, disrupting what we have been used to in the past? Are we moving backwards or forwards?

Political Theology in the United States

An example of political theology in today’s world that might help a lot of people understand this topic is discussing the new President of the United States, Donald Trump. Donald Trump has obviously made a lot of new orders in his first couple weeks in office. Trump and political theology go hand in hand with a lot of topics concerning each other and not just upsetting the United States, but countries around the world. However, President Trump made shocking waves when he made his travel ban act. Protesters across the world made a stand, protecting their brothers and sisters. However, even though society thinks that this is all wrong, the state believes that this is the correct thing.

Refugees are not allowed into the United States for now. Having this act, a lot of people can no longer visit the free country that our nation is so proud of. Many people across the world are now being denied a good education that they had dreamed about since they were little. Many families can no longer be reunited and many people can’t escape from a horrible life that they have been living. Political theology comes in and makes one question the good and just of life. Christians are known to do the right thing; this is …

Political Theology

POLITICAL THEOLOGY is one in a progression of endeavors made by Roman Catholic and Protestant scholars since the 1960s to deal with the establishments of Christianity in light of the twentieth-century emergency of culture. We don’t usually relate political religious philosophy or Carl Schmitt with opportunity. For sure, we will probably imagine that liberal political theory concentrates on flexibility, while political religious philosophy concentrates on the expert of sectarian beliefs.

Schmitt starts his Political Theology with the sovereign’s choice for the special case. In American political religious philosophy, this is the choice of the well-known sovereign for Revolution. That sacrificial demonstration denotes the nearness of the otherworldly estimation of the country as a chronicled extend.

Schmitt communicates the significance of this demonstration through a similarity to the supernatural occurrence. There is something extraordinary about the likelihood of upset, however we ought not be caught by this thought of exceptionality. The flexibility that is in question – opportunity as a demonstration in connection to, however not dictated by, guideline – additionally works in lawful judgment, talk, and theory.

Political Theology

Opportunity and Reason For Kant, and the vast majority of the individuals who tailed him, moral explanations behind activity are those that apply similarly to everybody. When we act ethically, we don’t support ourselves, however take up a “goal” or “impartial” position, asking what any objective operator ought to do the situation being what it is. An ethical guideline, as needs be, has an indistinguishable convincing quality from a sensible suggestion. Both present themselves to us as essentially genuine. In fact, every conveys the indicia of its truth in its formal structure. In this way, Kant’s well known straight out goal: ” Act just as indicated by that proverb whereby you can in the meantime will that it ought to wind up distinctly a general law.”

Kant remains here in a long philosophical custom that thinks opportunity is acknowledged in the force of motivation to constrain consent – whether in thought or practice. This recommends the waiting nearness of a religious perfect: we understand reality of ourselves just when we rise above the limited character of the body. Thoughts of the body as a “jail,” and of the faculties as offering a simply “perspectival” perspective of the genuine, or of the material world as one of fantasy are all very commonplace. They delineate the path in which the possibility of opportunity carries with it an exceptional sort of dread – the dread of an unreliable utilization of that flexibility. The reaction is to identify flexibility with truth, and truth with reason. The cost of opportunity, on this view, is actually the relinquishment of the distinction of the person.

God is the grapple of this whole thought, for he is flawlessly free and superbly requested. There is a total cover of His will and His reason: “at the outset was the word.” We are a “picture of God” and must, thusly, make progress toward a comparative cover of reason and will. He wills the …

Opinion – US Presidential Election

In Natan Sharansky’s book about freedom, his first book, he inserted quotes by experts about how democracy could never work in the USSR. Some of the quotes came from the speeches and writings of prominent Americans. They are prominent Americans whose professional work you and me, even if of opposite political views, would likely respect or admire. We cannot doubt, as some said was true then, that Soviet citizens of the tyrannical Soviet regime understood the value of freedom. Reader’s Digest once printed an article by a U. S. citizen who had visited Russia. A Soviet citizen approached him cautiously and said softly: “You are an American, aren’t you?” They were strangers to each other, so the American said, “Yes, but how did you guess?” The Soviet said: “You walk free.” We do walk free, and we take it for granted over-much.

That little story reminds that we should value what it means to “walk free.” We need to remember that any freedom can be lost if not cared for and guarded. Part of freedom inwardly is the freedom, which we can claim for ourselves, to think for ourselves. We all have heroes of past and present. Nevertheless, they deserve evaluation in the spotlight. They need to have their weaknesses as well as their strengths are known, as far as they relate to their influence. The best among them would expect and hope for no less from us.

Opinion - US Presidential Election

Election day for a new president has come, passed and surprised many. We who voted, need paid attention to the words and demeanor of both candidates, the good and the bad of each. We obviously were able to give good reasons for our final answer. Perhaps looking at who has the best record of fervor for freedom and democracy for this country. Both freedom and democracy are increasingly challenged concepts, even in America, a fact I never thought would be true. Now it is.

Many American citizens enjoy material benefits and personal and professional opportunities that exist in abundance in the U. S. They enjoy their political opinions. They take all of that freedom. They “take them and run,” as the saying goes. This attitude exists among some in academia, government service, churches, public schools, and community and state leaders. This attitude is rare in “the American heartland.” The race, gender, background, education, and even the military service of a candidate are not the main criteria for me. What matters most is who has a clear record of a desire to stand up for this country and for democracy and a clear determination to continue to be faithful to them.

The United States of America has always aimed to share freedom’s benefits, to help the rest of the world rise to freedom, through deliberate policies, strategies, and ways and in spite of agreement or disagreement between the White House and the Congress. Power rests upon the citizens of this country, invested in them by the Constitution and effective in total for as …

Unearthing Political Theology

When looking at how theological concepts link to politics and economics, the term used is Political Theology. Since the time of Jesus, the relationship between Christianity and politics has been heavily discussed. The term has been used by many men and women in many ways, but this is the general idea of what the term means.

Troubled past

The term has had a troubled past mainly because of what it has been associated with. Being endorsed by Carl Schmitt, a German political theologian born in 1888, it became associated with Nazism. This for the most part because Carl Schmitt was a follower of the Nazi ideology. Schmitt had hesitated the first few months after Hitler came to rule, but through Göring he started cooperating on the legal basis of the Third Reich. When doing this, he used his view on political theology. Because of this, it is important to separate the general idea of what the term means, and how Carl Schmitt and other political theologians in Nazi Germany explained the term in their writing.

Unearthing Political Theology

Johann Baptist Metz

When talking about the “general idea of what the term means,” we for the most part think of Johann Baptist Metz’s view on the topic. Metz was born in 1928, and was a German Catholic theologian. Together with Jürgen Moltmann, Metz wrote several texts on the term, their basis being in the direct confrontation of Nazism. Because of this, Johann Baptist Metz is surely one of the most influential German theologians after the second Vatican Council.

In similarity to many other political theologians, the work of Metz often talks of the dangerous memory of Jesus Christ. This is highly related to the anamnesis, a recollection, often of a supposed previous existence. Metz’s biggest motivation was in all probability to rebuild Christian theology from the ground up, following the Holocaust.

Sub-Saharan Africa& The Middle east

The term is not only used in Europe and the United States. In sub-Saharan Africa, for the most part South Africa, the term arrived from the relationship between politics and theology in the anti-apartheid movement. The number of Christians in sub-Saharan Africa has risen, which increased the need for Christian response to political and economic problems such as poverty, violence and war.

In the Middle east however, it is used by Christian leaders for other political problems. The way Christian leaders in the middle east approach the term, if for the most part a way of survival. Christians being a minority in the middle east, are often threatened. The term is therefore associated with survival of Christianity in that region.

What does the future hold?

There have been heavy speculations about whether postmodernity is over. The western culture has changed a lot, following events such as 9/11. The economic situation has changed the most. It’s therefore hard to predict what the future holds, mainly because everything is changing with such rapid speed.

United States of America

In the United States, one of the most influential political theologians in …